From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jim C. Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Mention pg_dump version portability
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 12:13:49 -0400
Message-ID: <20775.1147882429@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060517154120.GQ26212@decibel.org>
References: <20060515202354.GM26212@pervasive.com>
<200605152343.k4FNhK703441@candle.pha.pa.us>
<20060517154120.GQ26212@decibel.org>
"Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org> writes:
> pg_dump -Fc | pg_restore will only match the output of pg_dump if
> everything's the same version though, right? Or wrong? What happens if
> pg_dump -Fc is and older version and pg_restore is the current version?
There would probably be some small differences, but 99% of pg_restore's
output is just regurgitating SQL it finds in the dump file.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, decibel@decibel.org, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, jnasby@pervasive.com
Subject: Re: Mention pg_dump version portability
In-Reply-To: <20775.1147882429@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox