From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Two fixes for plpgsql.sgml
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:38:01 -0500
Message-ID: <20923.1196282281@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711282015.lASKFve27538@momjian.us>
References: <200711282015.lASKFve27538@momjian.us>
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Agreed. I couldn't find any value to that phrase and couldn't find better
> wording, so I removed it. Patch attached and applied.
This is not an improvement.
The point of the original wording is that you have to say
RETURNS SETOF sometype
you can't just say, eg,
RETURNS SET
Your new wording would lead the reader to the assumption that he can
just declare a function as returning "set".
Please revert the change.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, bruce@momjian.us, guillaume@lelarge.info, neilc@samurai.com
Subject: Re: Two fixes for plpgsql.sgml
In-Reply-To: <20923.1196282281@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox