From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: sean@materialize.io
Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Subscript expressions do not have to evaluate to integers
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 21:22:31 -0400
Message-ID: <2099092.1598059351@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200822003331.GN13363@momjian.us>
References: <159538675800.624.7728794628229799531@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
<20200822003331.GN13363@momjian.us>
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 02:59:18AM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
>> I believe a more appropriate statement would acknowledge that at least some
>> values undergo an explicit-style conversion to an integer.
> OK, how is the attached patch?
"and" is not an improvement over "which". Otherwise seems OK.
(The proposed patch for generic subscripting will probably need to
rewrite this completely, but for now this is an improvement.)
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, bruce@momjian.us, sean@materialize.io, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Subscript expressions do not have to evaluate to integers
In-Reply-To: <2099092.1598059351@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox