From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:53:04 -0500
Message-ID: <21686.1196283184@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071128202615.GG24146@fetter.org>
References: <20071128202615.GG24146@fetter.org>
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> Best practices for partitioning so far have shown that TRIGGERs are
> better than RULEs for most cases. Please find attached a patch which
> reflects this.
Entirely removing the example of how to do it with rules doesn't
seem like a good idea.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, david@fetter.org, pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules
In-Reply-To: <21686.1196283184@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox