From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Partitioning documentation example
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:35:43 -0500
Message-ID: <2489.1202276143@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080206050542.GQ1212@decibel.org>
References: <200801041527.m04FR7L19863@momjian.us>
<17842.1199467559@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<20080206050542.GQ1212@decibel.org>
Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 12:25:59PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> That won't actually work.
> I think it's still worthy as an example.
I think what we have here is a failure to communicate. How are you
going to do performance measurement on something that does not work?
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, decibel@decibel.org, bruce@momjian.us, simon@2ndquadrant.com
Subject: Re: Partitioning documentation example
In-Reply-To: <2489.1202276143@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox