From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
Cc: Patches (PostgreSQL) <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features?
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:21:00 -0400
Message-ID: <26167.1154395260@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44CE529F.2070701@joeconway.com>
References: <200607281947.k6SJlOI02533@momjian.us>
<473.1154116455@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<44CA76A9.8070101@joeconway.com>
<44CB051D.6090609@joeconway.com>
<21320.1154222840@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<26226.1154279741@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<44CE529F.2070701@joeconway.com>
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> I wanted to post an updated patch even though there are still things not
> working again after conversion to bare expressions.
I've been through the planner part of this and it looks OK (one or two
small errors). I'm currently messing with a revised version of the
grammar that supports putting VALUES everyplace that the spec allows,
and is a bit simpler than the old one to boot: it folds VALUES and
SELECT together, so we need fewer cases in the INSERT production.
Of course this breaks most of what you did in the parser :-( ...
I'm working on fixing that.
I'm about to go out to dinner but thought I'd post the gram.y and
parsenodes.h files so you could see where I'm headed. These are
diffs from CVS tip, not from your patch.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, mail@joeconway.com, pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features?
In-Reply-To: <26167.1154395260@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox