pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>
Cc: PG Docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: PL/PgSQL: stmt_fors and variable value after loop
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:24:04 -0500
Message-ID: <27460.1421684644@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54BD2E05.2090004@joh.to>
References: <54BD24C1.4060601@joh.to>
	<26441.1421682246@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<54BD2E05.2090004@joh.to>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-docs>

Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to> writes:
> On 1/19/15 4:44 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It seems to me that to do so would mostly be to encourage sloppy
>> programming practices, at the price of constraining future implementation
>> changes.  Can you give a compelling example of a non-kluge usage for
>> such an assumption?

> What I'm doing would look something like this:
> ...
> Available workarounds right now would be, as far as I can tell:

>    1) Have separate variables which I assign to inside the loop, and use 
> those in case the loop found exactly one row
>    2) Aggregate the (currency, balance) pairs into an array first, and 
> decide based on the array's cardinality what to do
>    3) Use a count(*) OVER () inside the query and EXIT if that count is 1
>    4) Extract the values back from the sole element in the 
> _AvailableAccounts array

> I don't particularly like any of those.

I would have said that (4) would be the natural thing.  What have you
got against it?

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs



view thread (6+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <27460.1421684644@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../27460.1421684644@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/27460.1421684644@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, marko@joh.to
  Subject: Re: PL/PgSQL: stmt_fors and variable value after loop
  In-Reply-To: <27460.1421684644@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox