From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Documenting removal of nonnullvalue() and friends
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 01:53:05 -0500
Message-ID: <27746.1299135185@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10715.1298828414@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <201102271727.p1RHR7a04699@momjian.us>
<10715.1298828414@sss.pgh.pa.us>
I wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I thought about this a bit more last night. It's certainly true that
>>> a lot of "internal" functions have comments that don't suggest that
>>> they're not meant to be used directly. What I think would be a good
>>> plan for functions that underlie operators is that we move any useful
>>> comments from pg_proc to pg_operator, and then install a comment in
>>> pg_proc that says "implementation of operator +" (or whatever the
>>> operator name is).
>>> ...
>>> If that sounds like a reasonable plan, I'm willing to have a go at it
>>> after the commitfest closes.
>> Tom, any work on this? A TODO?
> I haven't done anything about this yet, but it's still on my to-do list.
Done now.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, bruce@momjian.us, peter_e@gmx.net, robertmhaas@gmail.com, schmiddy@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Documenting removal of nonnullvalue() and friends
In-Reply-To: <27746.1299135185@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox