From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: farmernick-pg@varteg.nz
Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Subject: Re: 11.7 Indexes on Expressions: editorial correction
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 10:32:01 -0400
Message-ID: <29322.1589898721@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <158988567942.7029.7072931382965841497@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
References: <158988567942.7029.7072931382965841497@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> The paragraph that begins "If we were to declare this index UNIQUE,..."
> refers to the index test1_lower_col1_idx, not to the test1_uniq_int index it
> currently follows. It would appear the latter example was spliced into the
> middle of discussing the former.
Yes, this was complained of before:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/E1ikvbp-0005jW-E9%40gemulon.postgresql.org
I remain of the opinion that we'd be best off to just revert
a9760d0f3 altogether. Bruce's last proposal mostly did that,
but it still insisted on muddying an existing example with an
unrelated comment.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, farmernick-pg@varteg.nz, bruce@momjian.us
Subject: Re: 11.7 Indexes on Expressions: editorial correction
In-Reply-To: <29322.1589898721@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox