From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: e.rogov@postgrespro.ru
Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Subject: Re: Opclass name
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 11:10:21 -0400
Message-ID: <3096398.1635001821@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <163490076530.680.16106931952823231354@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
References: <163490076530.680.16106931952823231354@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> In commit 7a1cd526 (doc: Rework tables for built-in operator classes of
> index AMs) the name of the inet_ops opclass was changed to network_ops. It
> doesn't look right, because network_ops is the name of opfamily, not
> opclass.
Hm, yeah. The table title says "opclass", and that's definitely the
name that would be more useful to most users, so we should list opclass
not opfamily names. There are some other cases of opfname != opcname
in gist and brin, but those tables seem to give the opclass name in
each such case, so it's just this one mistake.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, e.rogov@postgrespro.ru, michael@paquier.xyz
Subject: Re: Opclass name
In-Reply-To: <3096398.1635001821@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox