pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: yigongh@gmail.com
Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: The suggestion of reducing autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay should be documented
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 19:59:07 -0400
Message-ID: <31430.1589327947@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKFQuwY1KMpxdfftdUWrcbnT4upE-sJSE8WDYhe8anNNSGjoUQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <158927918783.656.11973436145559215458@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
	<20200512214014.GD4666@momjian.us>
	<20200512214101.GA21408@momjian.us>
	<CAKFQuwY+RMFFM1Y44=2dpi_8TyTq_4yrLUG6VjWnzgQAhG6o7Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20200512224520.GE4666@momjian.us>
	<23940.1589325967@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20200512233056.GF4666@momjian.us>
	<CAKFQuwY1KMpxdfftdUWrcbnT4upE-sJSE8WDYhe8anNNSGjoUQ@mail.gmail.com>

"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> To be clear, because my cursory reading of the thread that was linked from
> the commit suggested that this specific situation was more "lets catch up
> to modern times", my position isn't that such documentation changes should
> be done as a rule, I am suggesting that we give a yes/no decision on this
> specific change (in advance of bike-shedding the wording).  IMO neither a
> blanket rule allowing or prohibiting such a change to the documentation
> makes sense given the rarity of the event.

Sure.  My point was just that changing the back-branch documentation would
require doing additional testing to verify that the proposed value is
an improvement in those branches.

			regards, tom lane





view thread (11+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <31430.1589327947@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../31430.1589327947@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/31430.1589327947@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, david.g.johnston@gmail.com, bruce@momjian.us, yigongh@gmail.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: The suggestion of reducing autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay should be documented
  In-Reply-To: <31430.1589327947@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox