From: Jonah H. Harris <jonah.harris@gmail.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
To: Susanne Ebrecht <susanne.ebrecht@credativ.de>
Subject: Re: 8.2 features?
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 21:50:06 -0400
Message-ID: <36e682920607131850m5503ccd5v6b9af0151de49c9a@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060714013026.GH17269@kenobi.snowman.net>
References: <44B69778.5050104@dunslane.net>
<50461.84.63.113.55.1152832991.squirrel@pezone.net>
<20060714013026.GH17269@kenobi.snowman.net>
On 7/13/06, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> I agree that it's probably not going to happen for 8.2 but I certainly
> have uses for the SQL spec's definition of MERGE (table-level instead of
> the individual-tuple case). I'd like to see the individual-tuple
> UPSERT/REPLACE issue handled as well but I don't believe MERGE lacking
> that necessairly means MERGE should be ignored..
Where does Jan stand on it, I know he was doing some thinking about
how to accomplish it.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1300
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 2nd Floor | jharris@enterprisedb.com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: jonah.harris@gmail.com, peter_e@gmx.net, andrew@dunslane.net, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, susanne.ebrecht@credativ.de
Subject: Re: 8.2 features?
In-Reply-To: <36e682920607131850m5503ccd5v6b9af0151de49c9a@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox