From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>
Subject: Re: Undocumented datetime functions
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 11:28:54 -0500
Message-ID: <3906.982427334@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0102171729060.933-100000@peter.localdomain>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0102171729060.933-100000@peter.localdomain>
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Hmm, I'm confused. The timestamp type doesn't actually have a time zone
> stored, does it? Why did you want it to be dumped as "timestamp with time
> zone" then?
Andreas pointed that out awhile ago. I'm inclined to agree: equating
timestamp to timestamp with time zone is dead wrong, and we should
revert that pg_dump change.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, peter_e@gmx.net, lockhart@fourpalms.org
Subject: Re: Undocumented datetime functions
In-Reply-To: <3906.982427334@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox