From: Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
To: Roberto Mello <rmello@cc.usu.edu>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Are <sect3>'s displayed in TOCs?
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 07:38:54 +0000
Message-ID: <3AB1C30D.FCA92127@archonet.com> (raw)
References: <20010315180329.A16436@cc.usu.edu>
Roberto Mello wrote:
>
> I am almost done with the PL/pgSQL doc revamping.
>
> Are <sect3>'s displayed in tables of contents? I have <sect3>s that
> would be much more appealing and useful to readers if they were displayed
> in the TOCs.
You can alter this in the stylesheets. If you have an nwalsh-modular
directory there is a dbautoc.??? file. Near the top of this are two
figures for the depth of the ToC - one for books, one for articles.
You can almost certainly override this sort of stuff on the command-line
but I haven't succeeded in doing so yet.
> If <sect3>'s won't be displayed, would it be ok for me to re-structure
> some PL/pgSQL topics into <sect1>s with <sect2>s ?
>
> -Roberto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: dev@archonet.com, rmello@cc.usu.edu
Subject: Re: Are <sect3>'s displayed in TOCs?
In-Reply-To: <3AB1C30D.FCA92127@archonet.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox