From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>
To: Oliver Elphick <olly@lfix.co.uk>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: timestamp() functions still documented
Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 07:15:42 -0700
Message-ID: <3CD29B8E.93F5701F@fourpalms.org> (raw)
References: <1020415612.11662.17.camel@linda>
...
> There are seven timestamp() functions in pg_proc and I don't think any
> of them can be used; should they not be removed or renamed?
They are used internally for type coersion. The problem is only at the
parser level, where SQL9x mandates a conflicting syntax.
- Thomas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: lockhart@fourpalms.org, olly@lfix.co.uk
Subject: Re: timestamp() functions still documented
In-Reply-To: <3CD29B8E.93F5701F@fourpalms.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox