pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Another modest proposal for docs formatting: catalog descriptions
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 22:12:15 -0400
Message-ID: <3cd8210d-be08-d80e-0066-fd2176e7347d@postgresql.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12984.1588643549@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <12984.1588643549@sss.pgh.pa.us>

On 5/4/20 9:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> As of HEAD, building the PDF docs for A4 paper draws 538 "contents
> ... exceed the available area" warnings.  While this is a nice step
> forward from where we were (v12 has more than 1500 such warnings),
> we're far from done fixing that issue.
> 
> A large chunk of the remaining warnings are about tables that describe
> the columns of system catalogs, system views, and information_schema
> views.  The typical contents of a row in such a table are a field name,
> a field data type, possibly a "references" link, and then a description.
> Unsurprisingly, this does not work very well for descriptions of more
> than a few words.  And not infrequently, we *need* more than a few words.
> 
> ISTM this is more or less the same problem we have/had with function
> descriptions, and so I'm tempted to solve it in more or less the same
> way.  Let's redefine the table layout to look like, say, this for
> pg_attrdef [1]:
> 
> oid oid
> 	Row identifier
> 
> adrelid oid (references pg_class.oid)
> 	The table this column belongs to
> 
> adnum int2 (references pg_attribute.attnum)
> 	The number of the column
> 
> adbin pg_node_tree
> 	The column default value, in nodeToString() representation. Use
> 	pg_get_expr(adbin, adrelid) to convert it to an SQL expression.
> 
> That is, let's go over to something that's more or less like a table-ized
> <variablelist>, with the fixed items for an entry all written on the first
> line, and then as much description text as we need.  The actual markup
> would be closely modeled on what we did for function-table entries.
> 
> Thoughts?

+1. Looks easy enough to read in a plaintext email, and if there are any
minor style nuances on the HTML front, I'm confident we'll solve them.

Jonathan

Attachments:

  signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 832B) download

view thread (24+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <3cd8210d-be08-d80e-0066-fd2176e7347d@postgresql.org>
Permalink:  ../3cd8210d-be08-d80e-0066-fd2176e7347d@postgresql.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/3cd8210d-be08-d80e-0066-fd2176e7347d@postgresql.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: jkatz@postgresql.org, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Another modest proposal for docs formatting: catalog descriptions
  In-Reply-To: <3cd8210d-be08-d80e-0066-fd2176e7347d@postgresql.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox