pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <docs@postgreSQL.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SESSION_USER
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 17:30:14 -0400
Message-ID: <4562.955747814@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200004142035.QAA04417@candle.pha.pa.us>
References: <200004142035.QAA04417@candle.pha.pa.us>

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> create_table.sgml mentions SESSION_USER is not supported.  I don't think
> that is true anymore, is it?

regression=# select session_user;
 getpgusername
---------------
 postgres
(1 row)

Looking at the spec, we do seem to be missing SYSTEM_USER out of the
four variants the spec mentions.  However, considering that we map
them all to the same thing anyway, I can't get too excited about it.

If something is done about making functions have setuid-like behavior,
we'd want to make sure that the appropriate ones of these functions
change value inside a function.

			regards, tom lane



view thread (6+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <4562.955747814@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../4562.955747814@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/4562.955747814@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org, docs@postgreSQL.org
  Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SESSION_USER
  In-Reply-To: <4562.955747814@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox