From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Use of 'now'
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 21:52:32 -0500
Message-ID: <4638.1005706352@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200111140246.fAE2kWE17608@candle.pha.pa.us>
References: <200111140246.fAE2kWE17608@candle.pha.pa.us>
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> Nothing of interest anymore, since 'current' has been removed as of 7.2.
>> However, Thomas has yet to commit any docs updates for his recent
>> datetime-related changes ... including that one ...
> Seems it is still in there somewhere:
> test=> create table bb (x timestamp default 'current', y int);
Hmm. It was *supposed* to be removed entirely, but possibly what
Thomas actually did was to continue to accept the keyword as equivalent
to 'now'. Thomas?
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, lockhart@fourpalms.org
Subject: Re: Use of 'now'
In-Reply-To: <4638.1005706352@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox