From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Albert Cervera i Areny <albert@nan-tic.com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:13:29 -0400
Message-ID: <46D6C279.5050200@dunslane.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200708301336.01489.peter_e@gmx.net>
References: <200708290157.07968.albert@nan-tic.com>
<7046.1188410001@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<46D5BA93.5060801@dunslane.net>
<200708301336.01489.peter_e@gmx.net>
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 29. August 2007 20:27 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
>
>> Also, let's recall what has previously been discussed for contrib,
>> namely that we break it out into standard modules
>>
>
> But that would also mean that the documentation system is somewhat
> modularized.
What? No it doesn't. You have missed the key word in the sentence above:
"standard". The idea is that the docs will describe the *standard*
modules, i.e. those that ship with the PostgreSQL core distribution
(because they are currently in contrib).
If you want to design a pluggable documentation system then go for it,
but it's not required by what I understand is the consensus plan for
contrib.
cheers
andrew
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: andrew@dunslane.net, peter_e@gmx.net, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, josh@agliodbs.com, albert@nan-tic.com
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online
In-Reply-To: <46D6C279.5050200@dunslane.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox