From: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pgsql-novice@postgresql.org, Mija Lee <mija@scharp.org>
Subject: Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 07:23:59 -0700
Message-ID: <46FE5FFF.6070606@sun.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25517.1191038302@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <25517.1191038302@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> If this is what's happening I'd claim it is a kernel bug, but seeing
> that I see it on FC6 and Miya sees it on Solaris 10, it would be a bug
> widespread enough that we'd not be likely to get it killed off soon.
>
I think my colleague was solving similar issue in JavaDB. IIRC the
problem is in how NFS works and conclusion was do not use JavaDB (Derby)
on NFS. I forwarded this issue to our NFS gurus and I will send updated
information.
Zdenek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, mija@scharp.org
Subject: Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea
In-Reply-To: <46FE5FFF.6070606@sun.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox