pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Postgres labeling inconsistency
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 11:43:45 -0700
Message-ID: <470685E1.6010501@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071005182650.GD6005@fetter.org>
References: <200710051922.01797.peter_e@gmx.net>
	<20071005182650.GD6005@fetter.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

David Fetter wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 07:22:01PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Some of you may have noticed that there was a move proposed to use
>> "Postgres" alongside "PostgreSQL" as a product name in the
>> documentation and other written resources.  A change along that line
>> has already been made in the FAQ.
>>

>> So I think what is being proposed is wrong and needs to be reverted.
> 
> That, or (my preference) make the change larger.  I think it's
> significant that the vast majority of compatible software has some
> variant of Postgres and *not* PostgreSQL in the name.

I have seen no evidence of this.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

> 
> Cheers,
> David.


- --

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997  http://www.commandprompt.com/
			UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHBoXhATb/zqfZUUQRAn76AJwIUIuHizLFSpqLoJYQo0c7JF0CJwCdHu8E
5tnkPv4UwCXnubexTWwiRlI=
=2Ufl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



view thread (11+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <470685E1.6010501@commandprompt.com>
Permalink:  ../470685E1.6010501@commandprompt.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/470685E1.6010501@commandprompt.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, david@fetter.org, peter_e@gmx.net
  Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Postgres labeling inconsistency
  In-Reply-To: <470685E1.6010501@commandprompt.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox