pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Another modest proposal for docs formatting: catalog descriptions
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 17:24:13 -0400
Message-ID: <47fe968e-eba4-b30b-2989-b52c095b5049@postgresql.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200506211836.GA27606@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <20200506211836.GA27606@alvherre.pgsql>

On 5/6/20 5:18 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Hello
> 
> I think the recent changes to CSS might have broken things in the XSLT
> build; apparently the SGML tooling did things differently.  Compare the
> screenshot of tables 67.2 and 67.3 ... 9.6 on the left, master on the
> right.  Is the latter formatting correct/desirable?

I know that 9.6 uses a different subset of the styles, and I recall the
text being blue during the original conversion. For example, the "table"
in the 9.6 docs has a class of "CALSTABLE" whereas in master, it is
"table" (and we operate off of it as "table.table" when doing lookups,
to ensure anything else with class "table" is unaffected).

There's also not as much control over some of the older documentation as
there are less classes we can bind the CSS too.

The latest changes should only affect master (devel) and beyond.

Jonathan

Attachments:

  signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 832B) download

view thread (24+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <47fe968e-eba4-b30b-2989-b52c095b5049@postgresql.org>
Permalink:  ../47fe968e-eba4-b30b-2989-b52c095b5049@postgresql.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/47fe968e-eba4-b30b-2989-b52c095b5049@postgresql.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: jkatz@postgresql.org, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, coelho@cri.ensmp.fr, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Another modest proposal for docs formatting: catalog descriptions
  In-Reply-To: <47fe968e-eba4-b30b-2989-b52c095b5049@postgresql.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox