From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation?
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 01:54:03 -0500
Message-ID: <5121.1196924043@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47579ADB.4000606@commandprompt.com>
References: <3393.1196917132@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<47579ADB.4000606@commandprompt.com>
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> ...Further those who have provided reasonable contribution really should be
> mentioned on the contributors page that is up for discussion which would
> make the rest of this moot yes?
I don't have any objection to listing people on the contributors page
on the strength of their work on contrib modules. But that seems
orthogonal to the question of what should be in the SGML docs ...
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, jd@commandprompt.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation?
In-Reply-To: <5121.1196924043@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox