pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
This Newbie is looking at pdf documentation
2+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]

* This Newbie is looking at pdf documentation
@ 2010-12-25 14:33  Leslie S Satenstein <lsatenstein@yahoo.com>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread

From: Leslie S Satenstein @ 2010-12-25 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-docs

I started to read the pdf file for version 9.0.2, since it is a document that I can peruse without being on the web.  I found some text that, to my mind, did not read well.

I could post in this email, some before after changes, but those would be my perceptions.  I was shown to use GIT with SGL but I am reviewing the PDF, and therefore the determination of the corresponding SGL is a lot of work. 

What I was after was a to be advised how to arrange peer review of some changes that I felt were touchups to the documentation. How to identify these peers and to get my recommended touchups to them, as well as feedback.

 
------------------

Regards  
Leslie

Mr. Leslie Satenstein
(I am a "he Leslie")
 




^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: This Newbie is looking at pdf documentation
@ 2010-12-25 18:42  Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
  parent: Leslie S Satenstein <lsatenstein@yahoo.com>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread

From: Peter Eisentraut @ 2010-12-25 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Leslie S Satenstein <lsatenstein@yahoo.com>; +Cc: pgsql-docs

On lör, 2010-12-25 at 06:33 -0800, Leslie S Satenstein wrote:
> I could post in this email, some before after changes, but those would
> be my perceptions.  I was shown to use GIT with SGL but I am reviewing
> the PDF, and therefore the determination of the corresponding SGL is a
> lot of work. 

Perhaps you can think of some other way to mark changes in a PDF
document that someone else can then review and process further, keeping
in mind that most of us like to work with open-source tools.

> What I was after was a to be advised how to arrange peer review of
> some changes that I felt were touchups to the documentation. How to
> identify these peers and to get my recommended touchups to them, as
> well as feedback.

This mailing list is your peer. :-)  Send your things here.




^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2010-12-25 18:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-12-25 14:33 This Newbie is looking at pdf documentation Leslie S Satenstein <lsatenstein@yahoo.com>
2010-12-25 18:42 ` Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox