From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: 9.4 recommendations for archive_command vs. replication slots
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:04:39 -0400
Message-ID: <54454EB7.9010601@gmx.net> (raw)
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-docs>
The 9.4 documentation for streaming replication still starts out by
making you set up archive_command and restore_command. Isn't that
obsolete now with replication slots? Shouldn't the first step be to set
up replication slots and then go from there?
If so, I think replication slots should feature more prominently in the
release notes.
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: peter_e@gmx.net
Subject: Re: 9.4 recommendations for archive_command vs. replication slots
In-Reply-To: <54454EB7.9010601@gmx.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox