public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Steve Atkins <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Is this still accurate?
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 10:33:23 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <4fe11dc1b660433594624b280b8ad832@SC58MEXGP036.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com>
<3d7cd4673a80438798ad20b83411e3ca@SC58MEXGP001.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com>
<1646547df04f4555a548ad7815208d5f@SC58MEXGP036.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com>
<[email protected]>
<68e5e2554e2240c6a22bd384fa7c9659@SC58MEXGP036.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com>
<[email protected]>
> On Jan 5, 2018, at 10:00 AM, Stephen Frost <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> * Moser, Glen G ([email protected]) wrote:
>> That's really the gist of the concern from a team member of mine. Not that the 4TB number is wrong but that it could be misleading to assume that 4TB is some sort of upper bound.
>>
>> That's how this concern was relayed to me and I am just following up.
>
> Well, saying 'in excess of' is pretty clear, but I don't think the
> sentence is really adding much either, so perhaps we should just remove
> it.
It's been useful a few times to reassure people that we can handle "large"
databases operationally, rather than just having large theoretical limits.
Updating it would be great, or wrapping a little more verbiage around the
4TB number, but a mild -1 on removing it altogether.
Cheers,
Steve
view thread (11+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Is this still accurate?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox