From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Thomas F. O'Connell <tfo@sitening.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Online Backups: Minor Caveat, Major Addition?
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 18:12:35 -0500
Message-ID: <8773.1142896355@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2DD8310C-92A3-495D-8AA5-499E6E43B28C@sitening.com>
References: <42D1F5FC-42DD-49D8-8509-0D68C5B9384C@sitening.com>
<8558.1142894925@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<2DD8310C-92A3-495D-8AA5-499E6E43B28C@sitening.com>
"Thomas F. O'Connell" <tfo@sitening.com> writes:
> What about the larger suggested change of breaking that section into
> three more granular subsections? I could see commentary being
> slightly more helpful for each.
No particular opinion from here.
Someone (was it Scott Marlowe?) recently volunteered to draft a
complete restructuring of the admin docs --- so it would probably be
better to think about this as part of that effort rather than a
standalone change.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, tfo@sitening.com
Subject: Re: Online Backups: Minor Caveat, Major Addition?
In-Reply-To: <8773.1142896355@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox