pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Theo Kramer <theo@flame.co.za>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 17:15:07 -0400
Message-ID: <99091817232103.00581@lowen.wgcr.org> (raw)
References: <20970.937688441@sss.pgh.pa.us>

On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Tom Lane wrote:
> While we are thinking about this, I wonder if it wouldn't be a good idea
> to separate out the executables that aren't really intended to be
> executed willy-nilly, and put them in a different directory.
> postmaster, postgres, and initdb have no business being in users' PATH
> at all, ever. 

Such as /usr/sbin on a Linux FSSTND-compliant system (such as RedHat).  In
fact, I may just do that with the RPM distribution (after consulting with RedHat
on the issue).  Thomas??  The same goes for the admin commands' man pages --
they should be in section 8 on the typical Linux box.

> to execute.  I suppose such an admin could stick pg_ on the front of the
> symlinks anyway.  But then the program names don't match the
> documentation we supply, which would be confusing.

Well, as things stand, the documentation and the rpm distribution don't match
in other areas -- I personally would have absolutely no problem whatsoever in
doing such a renaming -- hey, I can do such inside the RPM, for that matter,
but I don't want to.  Of course, I would follow whatever the core group decides
-- that is the standard.  I'm just tossing ideas.

Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio



view thread (42+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <99091817232103.00581@lowen.wgcr.org>
Permalink:  ../99091817232103.00581@lowen.wgcr.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/99091817232103.00581@lowen.wgcr.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: lamar.owen@wgcr.org, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, theo@flame.co.za, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2
  In-Reply-To: <99091817232103.00581@lowen.wgcr.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox