pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Gage <jsmgage@numericable.fr>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Another change to the same section once again to facilitate copying and pasting
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:34:07 +0200
Message-ID: <B292CCAB-124A-475D-8075-D7511395E465@numericable.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1280046663.28006.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net>
References: <9A88E54D-2CF7-403F-A0D8-35B9ECDC7103@numericable.fr>
	<1279974089.22066.3.camel@vanquo.pezone.net>
	<DE129122-F02D-4985-A32A-A18DE7A81F09@numericable.fr>
	<1280046663.28006.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net>

In   34.4.3. SQL Functions with Output Parameters   we have:

CREATE FUNCTION sum_n_product (x int, y int, OUT sum int, OUT product  
int) AS
'SELECT $1 + $2, $1 * $2'
LANGUAGE SQL;

SELECT * FROM sum_n_product(11,42);

sum | product
-----+---------
  53 | 462
(1 row)

Then in     34.4.7. SQL Functions Returning Sets     we have (without  
an example SELECT statement):

CREATE FUNCTION sum_n_product_with_tab (x int, OUT sum int, OUT  
product int) RETURNS SETOF record AS $$
SELECT $1 + tab.y, $1 * tab.y FROM tab;
$$ LANGUAGE SQL;

The problem is that if the reader copies and pastes the last function  
definition and then attempts to run it, quite obviously he gets an  
error because there is no table   "tab".
I would add a table definition and fill it with dummy data and then  
give two example SELECT statements after the function definition:

CREATE TABLE tab ( y integer, z integer );
INSERT INTO tab VALUES (1, 2), (3,4), (5,6), (7,8);

CREATE FUNCTION sum_n_product_with_tab (x int, OUT sum int, OUT  
product int) RETURNS SETOF record AS $$
SELECT $1 + tab.y, $1 * tab.y FROM tab;
$$ LANGUAGE SQL;

SELECT sum_n_product_with_tab(10);
SELECT * from sum_n_product_with_tab(10);

I think one of the things this presentation accomplishes is to  
emphasize that a table definition is really not much more than a type  
definition or object definition or what you will.  That is not said  
derogatorily at all.  Rather, I believe it emphasizes the  
extraordinary power of Postgresql.

John





view thread (2+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <B292CCAB-124A-475D-8075-D7511395E465@numericable.fr>
Permalink:  ../B292CCAB-124A-475D-8075-D7511395E465@numericable.fr/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/B292CCAB-124A-475D-8075-D7511395E465@numericable.fr

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: jsmgage@numericable.fr, peter_e@gmx.net
  Subject: Re: Another change to the same section once again to facilitate copying and pasting
  In-Reply-To: <B292CCAB-124A-475D-8075-D7511395E465@numericable.fr>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox