public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
To: Josh Kupershmidt <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DOCS] 9.0.3 pdf manual is missing bookmarks
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 08:57:17 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <OFCDC1B866.8E8ECBF4-ONC125786B.0021822E-C125786B.002287CA@gruppoautostrade.it>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>

On Apr 17, 2011 1:32 AM, "Josh Kupershmidt" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> [CC'ing the -www list, since this affects the PDFs provided by the
> website. Ugh, and resending without attachments since it looks like
> the last attempt didn't make it to the list.]
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:15 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> > the 9.0.2 has them, but 9.0.3 pdf documentation is missing the
bookmarks.
> > When looking for something is a real pain having to always use find or
> > switch back to TOC pages.
> >
> > Any chance that you can generate and republish a corrected doc?
>
> Hi Gabriele,
>
> Thanks for taking the time to report this, and sorry for the delay in
> following up. Just to clarify what (I think) Gabriele is complaining
> about, here [1] is a screenshot from the Okular viewer of the
> 9.0.3 -A4 or -US PDFs from the website [2]. You can see that the
> "Contents" pane in the top left is greyed out [3].
>
> When I built these PDFs from the 9.0.3 tarball myself, the results
> looked better [4]. Assuming this fixes Gabriele's problem, could we
> update the website with the fixed versions [5] of the 9.0.3 PDFs?

Could this be because of the efforts to reduce the size of the pdf's that
was implemented a while ago?

> Also, I noticed that the page of PDFs is not consistent with the PDF
> naming scheme wrt. minor version numbers. We provide e.g.
> "postgresql-8.4.6-A4.pdf" and "postgresql-9.0-A4.pdf". Personally, I
> like having the minor version number included, but could we just be
> consistent either way?

We have a standard now, 8.4 just predates it. The standard is without the
minor version, and the reasining behind this is both that it decreases
storage requiremenyåts and more imoortant that a new version doesn't
invalidate all old links, both on our own sites and othets...

/Magnus

view thread (19+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: [DOCS] 9.0.3 pdf manual is missing bookmarks
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox