public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: David G. Johnston <[email protected]>
To: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Omission of "(or C)" in psql's "pset title" header
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:16:22 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKFQuwYk4gQWUH8k_TAm5LERmr_0r+XmGwYqC5NKtbSUSWGNgg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <CAKFQuwYOmtkz1t+d-MbhmrH0KiKd2t=csmRqrBPSqEvxoYXkrg@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAKFQuwa501iGXsh1M0tjWEZ=zPLBUzyDzMJrjf8S1_yC=oDufA@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAKFQuwZLaJAnATfdx+crgUmcQCQSog3=77jf_cwLSBDz=Q+P7w@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsub%20pgsql-docs>

On Thursday, August 27, 2015, Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:50:53AM -0400, David G. Johnston wrote:
> > ​Yes, I read that as "\pset tuples_only" and "\t" are alternate forms of
> the
> > same thing
> > ​ and thought that "\pset title" and "\C" should be documented
> similarly.
> > Making "\pset C <label>" work doesn't seem like an improvement.
>
> Well, making \pset C is at least consistent.  We can't say "or C"
> without it.
>
>
Agreed.

view thread (10+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Omission of "(or C)" in psql's "pset title" header
  In-Reply-To: <CAKFQuwYk4gQWUH8k_TAm5LERmr_0r+XmGwYqC5NKtbSUSWGNgg@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox