public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Documentation in book length
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 11:36:22 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Tom Lane writes:
> BTW, the Red Hat RHDB group has spent a fair amount of time rethinking
> the overall organization of the docs and trying to organize 'em in a
> more logical order. They'd like to contribute that work back so they
> don't have to maintain a variant version of the docs. Is this a good
> time to think about looking over what they've done?
Yes, we shall use them as an example of how not to do it.
I spend quite some time today to analyze their documentation arrangement,
but it doesn't make sense to me. There are a couple of obvious
rearrangements and a couple of things we could think about if they were
briefly explained, but overall it looks pretty confused, to say it nicely.
--
Peter Eisentraut [email protected]
view thread (16+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Documentation in book length
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox