pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Erki Eessaar <erki.eessaar@taltech.ee>
Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org <pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: SQL-standard function bodies and creating SECURITY DEFINER routines securely
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:07:43 -0400
Message-ID: <YzR/X5Hhyu4HaUj2@momjian.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yvvw1JB/Y12HvAYn@momjian.us>
References: <AM9PR01MB8268BF5E74E119828251FD34FE409@AM9PR01MB8268.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
	<Yvvw1JB/Y12HvAYn@momjian.us>

On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 03:32:36PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 02:36:27PM +0000, Erki Eessaar wrote:
> > 
> > Hello
> > 
> > PostgreSQL 14 added the feature: "Allow SQL-language functions and procedures
> > to use SQL-standard function bodies."
> > 
> > If I understand correctly, then in this case the system  will track
> > dependencies between tables and routines that use the tables. Thus, the
> > SECURITY DEFINER routines that use the new approach do not require the
> > following mitigation, i.e., SET search_path= is not needed. The following part
> > of documentation does not mention this.
> > 
> > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-createfunction.html#
> > SQL-CREATEFUNCTION-SECURITY
> > 
> > [elephant] PostgreSQL: Documentation: 14: CREATE FUNCTION
> >            Overloading. PostgreSQL allows function overloading; that is, the
> >            same name can be used for several different functions so long as
> >            they have distinct input argument types.Whether or not you use it,
> >            this capability entails security precautions when calling functions
> >            in databases where some users mistrust other users; see Section
> >            10.3.. Two functions are considered the same if they have the same
> >            ...
> >            www.postgresql.org
> 
> I have written the attached patch to mention this issue about sql_body
> functions.

The doc patch was reverted based on feedback in this email thread:

	https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/AM9PR01MB8268BF5E74E119828251FD34FE409%40AM9PR01MB8268.eu...

If you think we should add new wording, please suggest it, thanks.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Indecision is a decision.  Inaction is an action.  Mark Batterson






view thread (14+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <YzR/X5Hhyu4HaUj2@momjian.us>
Permalink:  ../YzR%2FX5Hhyu4HaUj2@momjian.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/YzR/X5Hhyu4HaUj2@momjian.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: bruce@momjian.us, erki.eessaar@taltech.ee, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: SQL-standard function bodies and creating SECURITY DEFINER routines securely
  In-Reply-To: <YzR/X5Hhyu4HaUj2@momjian.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox