pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: tpo_deb@sourcepole.ch
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Make SSPI documentation clearer
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 20:36:53 -0400
Message-ID: <ZA5wJQFOcULuIwwn@tamriel.snowman.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <167846222574.1803490.15815104179136215862@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
References: <167846222574.1803490.15815104179136215862@wrigleys.postgresql.org>

Greetings,

* PG Doc comments form (noreply@postgresql.org) wrote:
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/sspi-auth.html
> Description:
> 
> The [current SSPI
> documentation](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sspi-auth.html)
> reads:
> 
> "SSPI authentication only works when both server and client are running
> Windows, or, on non-Windows platforms, when GSSAPI is available."
> 
> I interpret that phrase like this:
> 
> * there's a case where both server and client are running Windows
> * there's a case where both are running non-Windows

Yeah, that phrasing isn't great.

> What about mixed cases? When the client is non-Windows, then can it use
> SSPI? No, AFAIK not. So I'd suggest to make that phrase above clearer and
> completely explicit:

SSPI is Windows-specific, yeah.

> "SSPI authentication works when both server and client are running
> Windows.
> 
> When the server is on a non-Windows platform then the server must use GSSAPI
> if it wants to authenticate the client either via Kerberos or via Active
> Directory. A client on a Windows platform that connects to a non-Windows
> Postgresql server can either use SSPI (strongly encouraged) or GSS (much
> more difficult to set up) if it wants to authenticate via Kerberos or Active
> Directory. A client from a non-Windows platform must use GSS if it wants to
> authenticate via Kerberos or Active Directory."

Rather than work in negative, I feel like it might make more sense to
work in positives?  That is, perhaps this instead:

On Windows platforms, SSPI is the default and most commonly used
mechanism.  Note that an SSPI client can authenticate to a server which
is using either SSPI or GSSAPI, and a GSSAPI client can authenticate to
a server which is using either SSPI or GSSAPI.  Generally speaking,
clients and servers on Windows are recommended to use SSPI while clients
and servers on Unix (non-Windows) platforms use GSSAPI.

Stricltly speaking, this is all independent of if AD is being used as
the KDC or not.

Thanks,

Stephen

Attachments:

  [application/pgp-signature] signature.asc (832B, ../ZA5wJQFOcULuIwwn@tamriel.snowman.net/2-signature.asc)
  download

view thread (9+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <ZA5wJQFOcULuIwwn@tamriel.snowman.net>
Permalink:  ../ZA5wJQFOcULuIwwn@tamriel.snowman.net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/ZA5wJQFOcULuIwwn@tamriel.snowman.net

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: sfrost@snowman.net, tpo_deb@sourcepole.ch, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Make SSPI documentation clearer
  In-Reply-To: <ZA5wJQFOcULuIwwn@tamriel.snowman.net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox