pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: updatable cursors and ORDER BY
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 20:44:14 -0400
Message-ID: <b0af1f4a-b39f-5a18-fcd2-b4f2a4a0303e@2ndquadrant.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180528171716.GA5306@momjian.us>
References: <fa0e80d3-a734-4db1-cf66-fe6d3a6c043b@2ndquadrant.com>
	<2966.1525921045@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<8dc63ba7-dc56-fc7c-fc16-4fae03e3bfe6@2ndquadrant.com>
	<22649.1525971323@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20180528171716.GA5306@momjian.us>

On 5/28/18 13:17, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:55:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>>> I think that last part isn't actually written down anywhere.  (It only
>>> states the converse.)  How about a clarification like this:
>>
>>> @@ -271,7 +271,10 @@ <title id="sql-declare-notes-title">Notes</title>
>>>       and not use grouping or <literal>ORDER BY</literal>).  Cursors
>>>       that are not simply updatable might work, or might not, depending on plan
>>>       choice details; so in the worst case, an application might work in testing
>>> -     and then fail in production.
>>> +     and then fail in production.  If <literal>FOR UPDATE</literal> is
>>> +     specified, then the cursor is guaranteed to be updatable, or the
>>> +     <command>DECLARE</command> command will error if an updatable cursor
>>> +     cannot be created for the supplied query.
>>>      </para>
>>
>> OK by me, except we don't usually use "error" as a verb.  Either "fail"
>> or "throw an error" would read better IMO.  Or you could just stop with
>> "guaranteed to be updatable"; I don't think the rest adds much.
> 
> I have done as you suggested and just used the first part;  patch
> attached and backpatched.

I think we should still add the second part, because it currently
doesn't say anything about that a cursor declaration might fail if an
updatable cursor cannot be created.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services




view thread (2+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <b0af1f4a-b39f-5a18-fcd2-b4f2a4a0303e@2ndquadrant.com>
Permalink:  ../b0af1f4a-b39f-5a18-fcd2-b4f2a4a0303e@2ndquadrant.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/b0af1f4a-b39f-5a18-fcd2-b4f2a4a0303e@2ndquadrant.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com, bruce@momjian.us, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
  Subject: Re: updatable cursors and ORDER BY
  In-Reply-To: <b0af1f4a-b39f-5a18-fcd2-b4f2a4a0303e@2ndquadrant.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox