From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
To: sanjaya.waruna@gmail.com
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: vacuum_freeze_min_age description validity
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 00:08:03 +0200
Message-ID: <cda2f2e486d4889a23f7c1080433f462a93fc8e8.camel@cybertec.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <163186886974.4680.11795770889268302099@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
References: <163186886974.4680.11795770889268302099@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
On Fri, 2021-09-17 at 08:54 +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/routine-vacuuming.html
> Description:
>
> Hi All,
> I have a doubt about the vacuum_freeze_min_age explanation here;
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/routine-vacuuming.html
> "vacuum_freeze_min_age controls how old an XID value has to be before rows
> bearing that XID will be frozen. Increasing this setting may avoid
> unnecessary work if the rows that would otherwise be frozen will soon be
> modified again, but decreasing this setting increases the number of
> transactions that can elapse before the table must be vacuumed again."
>
> Shouldn't the "Increasing" and "decreasing" words there interchange the
> places?
> Isn't decreasing value for vacuum_freeze_min_age causes vacuum to freeze
> tuples soon due to reduced age? So it reduces number of transactions that
> can elapse before the table must be vacuumed.
> Please let me know if my understanding is incorrect.
The documentation is correct.
If you increase the parameter, rows will be frozen later, so if the rows get
deleted before they would get frozen, you save the work of freezing them.
If you decrease the parameter, rows get frozen earlier, so the time until
anti-wraparound vacuum is necessary will increase.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: laurenz.albe@cybertec.at, sanjaya.waruna@gmail.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: vacuum_freeze_min_age description validity
In-Reply-To: <cda2f2e486d4889a23f7c1080433f462a93fc8e8.camel@cybertec.at>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox