agora inbox for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
To: Toppr Tenali <shreeharish271203@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Clarify base backups and local pg_wal recycling
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 15:13:07 +0200
Message-ID: <de5e2353662f14bd127ab4dcbe15d8dad8eb566b.camel@cybertec.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <91E1FA52-66B0-44F5-91C6-17FF3B5D23AB@gmail.com>
References: <91E1FA52-66B0-44F5-91C6-17FF3B5D23AB@gmail.com>
On Tue, 2026-09-29 at 21:03 +0530, Toppr Tenali wrote:
> I would like to suggest a clarification to the PostgreSQL documentation regarding base
> backups and local WAL recycling.
>
> The documentation explains separately that:
>
> - archived WAL required by a base backup can eventually be deleted once that backup
> is safely archived
I'd say that is wrong - you need to *retain* the WAL required to recover a backup,
otherwise you cannot restore it. Where in the documentation do you see that sentence?
> - WAL segments in pg_wal can be recycled or removed after they are no longer needed
> and, when archiving is enabled, have been successfully archived.
Right, but you forgot that replication slots will also keep PostgreSQL from
deleting WAL segments.
> However, I could not find an explicit statement about whether taking or completing a
> base backup itself affects when WAL segments in the local pg_wal directory become
> eligible for recycling/removal.
>
> Could the documentation explicitly clarify this relationship?
I don't think that there is a relationship between WAL recycling and a base backup,
so there is nothing to document.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
view thread (3+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <de5e2353662f14bd127ab4dcbe15d8dad8eb566b.camel@cybertec.at>
Permalink: ../de5e2353662f14bd127ab4dcbe15d8dad8eb566b.camel@cybertec.at/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/de5e2353662f14bd127ab4dcbe15d8dad8eb566b.camel@cybertec.at
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: laurenz.albe@cybertec.at, shreeharish271203@gmail.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Clarify base backups and local pg_wal recycling
In-Reply-To: <de5e2353662f14bd127ab4dcbe15d8dad8eb566b.camel@cybertec.at>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox