agora inbox for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
To: Toppr Tenali <shreeharish271203@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Clarify base backups and local pg_wal recycling
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 15:13:07 +0200
Message-ID: <de5e2353662f14bd127ab4dcbe15d8dad8eb566b.camel@cybertec.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <91E1FA52-66B0-44F5-91C6-17FF3B5D23AB@gmail.com>
References: <91E1FA52-66B0-44F5-91C6-17FF3B5D23AB@gmail.com>

On Tue, 2026-09-29 at 21:03 +0530, Toppr Tenali wrote:
> I would like to suggest a clarification to the PostgreSQL documentation regarding base
> backups and local WAL recycling.
> 
> The documentation explains separately that:
> 
> - archived WAL required by a base backup can eventually be deleted once that backup
>   is safely archived

I'd say that is wrong - you need to *retain* the WAL required to recover a backup,
otherwise you cannot restore it.  Where in the documentation do you see that sentence?

> - WAL segments in pg_wal can be recycled or removed after they are no longer needed
>   and, when archiving is enabled, have been successfully archived.

Right, but you forgot that replication slots will also keep PostgreSQL from
deleting WAL segments.

> However, I could not find an explicit statement about whether taking or completing a
> base backup itself affects when WAL segments in the local pg_wal directory become
> eligible for recycling/removal.
> 
> Could the documentation explicitly clarify this relationship? 

I don't think that there is a relationship between WAL recycling and a base backup,
so there is nothing to document.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe





view thread (3+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <de5e2353662f14bd127ab4dcbe15d8dad8eb566b.camel@cybertec.at>
Permalink:  ../de5e2353662f14bd127ab4dcbe15d8dad8eb566b.camel@cybertec.at/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/de5e2353662f14bd127ab4dcbe15d8dad8eb566b.camel@cybertec.at

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: laurenz.albe@cybertec.at, shreeharish271203@gmail.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Clarify base backups and local pg_wal recycling
  In-Reply-To: <de5e2353662f14bd127ab4dcbe15d8dad8eb566b.camel@cybertec.at>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox