pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
To: nikolai.berkoff <nikolai.berkoff@pm.me>
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org <pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: COMMENT ON lock
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:37:35 +0100
Message-ID: <faffeca61e7bb1338a7da72dc880bd47624adc3d.camel@cybertec.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <_0HDHIGcCdCsUyXn22QwI2FEuNR6Fs71rtgGX6hfyBlUh5rrnE2qMmvIFu9EY4Pijr2gUmJEAXCjuNU2Oxku9TryLp9CdHllpsCfN3gD0-Y=@pm.me>
References: <_0HDHIGcCdCsUyXn22QwI2FEuNR6Fs71rtgGX6hfyBlUh5rrnE2qMmvIFu9EY4Pijr2gUmJEAXCjuNU2Oxku9TryLp9CdHllpsCfN3gD0-Y=@pm.me>

On Tue, 2022-01-18 at 14:11 +0000, nikolai.berkoff wrote:
> I wanted to know what lock the COMMENT ON command took and I had to look in the
> source code, makes sense to me that it should be documented.  I've also added
> it to the list of commands that take a SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE lock.

+1, but SHARE ACCESS EXCLUSIVE should be marked up with <literal>.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe






view thread (4+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <faffeca61e7bb1338a7da72dc880bd47624adc3d.camel@cybertec.at>
Permalink:  ../faffeca61e7bb1338a7da72dc880bd47624adc3d.camel@cybertec.at/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/faffeca61e7bb1338a7da72dc880bd47624adc3d.camel@cybertec.at

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: laurenz.albe@cybertec.at, nikolai.berkoff@pm.me, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: COMMENT ON lock
  In-Reply-To: <faffeca61e7bb1338a7da72dc880bd47624adc3d.camel@cybertec.at>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox