From: Henry B. Hotz <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov>
To: ljb <ljb220@mindspring.com>
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Request temporary freeze of libpgtcl chapter in manual
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 15:01:04 -0800
Message-ID: <p05210601bc5d935a3ce3@[192.168.0.134]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c13m8v$4ef$1@news.hub.org>
References: <c13m8v$4ef$1@news.hub.org>
At 1:01 AM +0000 2/20/04, ljb wrote:
>I would like to request that no changes be made to the libpgtcl
>chapter in the PostgreSQL reference manual, at least for the near term,
>beyond file revision 1.40 in CVS. Otherwise, I can't promise any changes
>you make will end up in my version of the manual, in the event that the
>unbundling effort is successful. Is this OK?
I'm not contributing, so it's not an issue for me.
However isn't the whole point of CVS to make re-merging changes like this easy?
--
The opinions expressed in this message are mine,
not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government.
Henry.B.Hotz@jpl.nasa.gov, or hbhotz@oxy.edu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: hotz@jpl.nasa.gov, ljb220@mindspring.com
Subject: Re: Request temporary freeze of libpgtcl chapter in manual
In-Reply-To: <p05210601bc5d935a3ce3@[192.168.0.134]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox