agora inbox for pgsql-general@postgresql.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Rob Sell <lists@facnd.com>
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Optimizing query
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 07:44:06 -0600
Message-ID: <003201c3aea3$33cc38b0$640101c0@rob> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FBB60BE.4010407@myrealbox.com>
Greetings all,
Yesterday I upgraded from 7.3 to 7.4 now psql doesn't work! I get the
following error.
psql: relocation error: psql: undefined symbol: get_progname
Any ideas out there?
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Shridhar Daithankar
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 6:23 AM
To: Uros
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Optimizing query
Uros wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have some trouble getting good results from my query.
>
> here is structure
>
> stat_views
> id | integer
> id_zone | integer
> created | timestamp
>
>
> I have btree index on created and also id and there is 1633832 records in
> that table
>
> First of all I have to manualy set seq_scan to OFF because I always get
> seq_scan. When i set it to off my explain show:
>
> explain SELECT count(*) as views FROM stat_views WHERE id = 12;
> QUERY PLAN
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
> Aggregate (cost=122734.86..122734.86 rows=1 width=0)
> -> Index Scan using stat_views_id_idx on stat_views
(cost=0.00..122632.60 rows=40904 width=0)
> Index Cond: (id = 12)
>
> But what I need is to count views for some day, so I use
>
> explain SELECT count(*) as views FROM stat_views WHERE date_part('day',
created) = 18;
>
> QUERY PLAN
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
> Aggregate (cost=100101618.08..100101618.08 rows=1 width=0)
> -> Seq Scan on stat_views (cost=100000000.00..100101565.62 rows=20984
width=0)
> Filter: (date_part('day'::text, created) = 18::double precision)
>
>
> How can I make this to use index and speed the query. Now it takes about
12
> seconds.
Can you post explain analyze for the same?
Shridhar
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
view thread (41+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <003201c3aea3$33cc38b0$640101c0@rob>
Permalink: ../003201c3aea3$33cc38b0$640101c0@rob/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/003201c3aea3$33cc38b0$640101c0@rob
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Cc: lists@facnd.com
Subject: Re: Optimizing query
In-Reply-To: <003201c3aea3$33cc38b0$640101c0@rob>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox