From: Steven Lembark <lembark@wrkhors.com>
To: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
Cc: lembark@wrkhors.com
Subject: Re: Rationale for aversion to the central database?
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 09:54:27 -0500
Message-ID: <20180428095427.0fe0589a@wrkhors.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180428060221.6yohlxwvv746wqik@hjp.at>
References: <201804272252.w3RMqdes046670@rs113.luxsci.com>
<20180428060221.6yohlxwvv746wqik@hjp.at>
On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 08:02:21 +0200
"Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-pgsql@hjp.at> wrote:
> On 2018-04-27 22:52:39 +0000, g@luxsci.net wrote:
> > Perhaps I'm extreme. In my ideal world, developers might not even
> > know table names! I'm kidding ,sorta...
>
> If they don't know the table names, how can they write those stored
> procedures?
One of the main reasons DBA's need to be pigs. Much spaghetti can be
avoided in ORM frameworks with well-designed views.
--
Steven Lembark 1505 National Ave
Workhorse Computing Rockford, IL 61103
lembark@wrkhors.com +1 888 359 3508
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Cc: lembark@wrkhors.com, pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Rationale for aversion to the central database?
In-Reply-To: <20180428095427.0fe0589a@wrkhors.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox