From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Is anyone using db_user_namespace?
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 10:45:31 -0700
Message-ID: <20230710174531.GB257945@nathanxps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230630215608.GD2941194@nathanxps13>
References: <20230630215608.GD2941194@nathanxps13>
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 02:56:08PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Over in pgsql-hackers, I've proposed removing the db_user_namespace
> parameter in v17 [0]. I am personally not aware of anyone using this
> parameter, but I wanted to give folks an opportunity to object in case they
> are using it (or are aware of someone who is).
>
> [0] https://postgr.es/m/20230630200509.GA2830328%40nathanxps13
Bumping this thread. As long as no objections materialize, I plan to
remove this parameter shortly.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Cc: nathandbossart@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Is anyone using db_user_namespace?
In-Reply-To: <20230710174531.GB257945@nathanxps13>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox