pg.ddx.io  pgsql-general@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Terenzio <matt@jobsforge.com>
To: PgSQL General <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Replication
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:01:55 -0400
Message-ID: <21ea6e1bf57938abc3235e3526b40350@jobsforge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <432B2B82.5030709@gmail.com>
References: <BF505885.3181F%scott_ribe@killerbytes.com>
	<432B0627.2030700@gmail.com>
	<1126899631.30120.43.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
	<432B2B82.5030709@gmail.com>


On Sep 16, 2005, at 4:30 PM, Russ Brown wrote:

>> just because replication is  included and
>> part of the core of a database, it doesn't mean that it's reliable or
>> well tested.

I just jumped into this thread, and this statement just triggers one 
thought.

Many Postgres end users rely on experts like those on this list for the 
best advice on how to use Postgres and what might be the best solution 
for non-core needs such as replication.

Inclusion does probably make those users feel comfort that the experts 
for that particular software or product deems it one of , if not the 
best solution for the given problem.

It's not always true and may not be right for this situation, since 
replication needs for different situations may vary widely.

But inclusion does imply some type of endorsement.

For instance I feel pretty comfortable with TSeach2 though I don't know 
much about. That fact that it comes in the contribs is an endorsement.
I'd be confused if the consensus was that there is a better, as easy to 
use and license compatible full text index available and was for some 
reason NOT included.

Of course, I'd still ask the list. . .




view thread (131+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <21ea6e1bf57938abc3235e3526b40350@jobsforge.com>
Permalink:  ../21ea6e1bf57938abc3235e3526b40350@jobsforge.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/21ea6e1bf57938abc3235e3526b40350@jobsforge.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
  Cc: matt@jobsforge.com
  Subject: Re: Replication
  In-Reply-To: <21ea6e1bf57938abc3235e3526b40350@jobsforge.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox