From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: y39chen <yan-jack.chen@nokia.com>
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Is there possibility btree_redo with XLOG_BTREE_DELETE done between standby_redo and the end of backup
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 11:18:48 -0400
Message-ID: <2253.1495639128@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1495609157661-5963011.post@n3.nabble.com>
References: <1495609157661-5963011.post@n3.nabble.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-general>
y39chen <yan-jack.chen@nokia.com> writes:
> is there possibility btree_redo with XLOG_BTREE_DELETE info done between
> standby_redo and the end of backup? I have PostgreSQL 9.3.14 which have
> some patches to use and easy to happen.
> ...
> //inconsistent detected in btree_xlog_delete_get_latestRemovedXid()
> [26005-59251d35.6595-726087] 2017-05-24 05:42:22.513 GMT < > WARNING:
> 01000: btree_xlog_delete_get_latestRemovedXid: cannot operate with
> inconsistent data
This looks a whole lot like a bug we fixed in 9.3.15, cf
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/DB5PR07MB15416C65687A1EA9AC0D26F8D6E00%40DB5PR07MB1541.eu...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, yan-jack.chen@nokia.com
Subject: Re: Is there possibility btree_redo with XLOG_BTREE_DELETE done between standby_redo and the end of backup
In-Reply-To: <2253.1495639128@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox