public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Johannes Lochmann <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: question on audit columns
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 09:58:49 +0100
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <CAEzWdqd=83DQo4SK0sjPhBNAHGCvdcJ3X0OruFLgkL008AM8ug@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPnRvGvHAC8HjLCZ2uUBCRZ7=fMJnkTPd3cBOchJu-Vn7G2MHg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEzWdqfUWE=fuR5k1rd1iQx4K1-LceW3razY8f_tb9YONAZRMQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<DBAPR01MB6840804A91ABB765B0A07EACF29C2@DBAPR01MB6840.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
	<[email protected]>

... and (3) the values are not updated on manual actions without 
triggers - which might or might not be desirable depending on the intention.

Best,

Johannes

On 9/4/2024 16:36, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 9/4/24 06:17, Khan Muhammad Usman wrote:
>> Yes this would be the better approach.
>
> 1) Except the overhead is now shifted to the application, which may or 
> not be better. You are also moving the audit responsibility to the 
> application and the application maintainers and making it application 
> specific. If a new application/client starts hitting the database and 
> it did not get the memo about the audit fields they won't be filled in.
>
> 2) I would recommend setting up a some realistic tests and see if the 
> overhead of the update triggers would be a concern.
>
>
>

view thread (5+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: question on audit columns
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox