public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: iseki zero <[email protected]>
To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
To: Erik Wienhold <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Questions about document "Concurrenry control" section
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 10:25:08 +0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>

So, should I use the [reply to all] button? I'm afraid the receipt list 
will growing to have too many address.

BTW, I'm using Thunderbird. If you have better software, tell me please.

Sorry for my poor English.

iseki zero.

在 2024/10/11 22:19, Tom Lane 写道:
> Erik Wienhold<[email protected]> writes:
>> On 2024-10-11 15:00 +0200, iseki wrote:
>>> But why the mailing list haven't use the "Reply-To" header specify where to
>>> reply? Because the mail is you send to me directly?
>> The message author sets Reply-To, if necessary, according to RFC 5322.
>> Are there mailing lists that actually set this header?
> It's been done in the past, but current practice is strongly against
> it.  For example, in your own message that I'm replying to, there's
> a DKIM signature (RFC 6376):
>
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ewie.name; s=MBO0001;
> 	t=1728654419;
> 	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
> 	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
> 	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
> 	bh=7w7CHebdKaXtlhCMxa/jNIcoEy1tFhZmzOD+dT7nP8k=;
> 	b=K3s//HzYXU+chTDeY5p/wGwd5eglESiaugVSpGWo49ryL9ajLdimYMD3uIc3rr8PglZizV
> 	nk2wDiMsHnLR0EAgKsGzNvtxt4N9hHxMk7UI3F4XOVYqnemk95YVRNpFpEFww833uUqA+9
> 	RPypj/ezsKbi2vBzzXIoZ+Tf3t6XfuZYf6poq1J+ud0X278yQMnA1XbZNsenQkCWoYPiXb
> 	yklxY2Nbp9NyiDHCDQ0KPYAT6/0ttzbprNhgSzhN7LND6ehUvLlsmKG3rwqby2LmFRwliQ
> 	RDZ4MAxEzZKfOr8HGnubQf8FdQPGw6jlAn3U8199c+3QcIAWJ99Wrtb5rQPdEw==
>
> That lists "reply-to" as one of the signed header fields.  So if the
> mailing list were to modify Reply-To (including inserting one where
> there was none before) a DKIM-verifying recipient would regard the
> message as a forgery.
>
> 			regards, tom lane
>
>

view thread (12+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Questions about document "Concurrenry control" section
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox