From: Glenn Sullivan <glenn.sullivan@varianinc.com>
To: pgsql-general <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Subject: shared buffers
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:31:24 -0600
Message-ID: <417D629C.7000805@varianinc.com> (raw)
Hi,
In the 7.4.5 version, the code is now trying to use a much larger
value for shared_buffers. I can certainly set this to a lower number
with the -B option. However, my guestion is:
What is the performance issue with setting shared_buffers to something like 45?
In doing some timing on my system, I cannot tell any difference with 45 versus 1000.
Perhaps I am looking at the wrong performance criteria.
Thanks,
Glenn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Cc: glenn.sullivan@varianinc.com
Subject: Re: shared buffers
In-Reply-To: <417D629C.7000805@varianinc.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox