pg.ddx.io  pgsql-general@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: imai.yoshikazu@fujitsu.com <imai.yoshikazu@fujitsu.com>
Cc: Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: v12 and pg_restore -f-
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 09:46:00 -0500
Message-ID: <8586.1572965160@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191105143812.GM6962@tamriel.snowman.net>
References: <20191104145336.GA23924@alvherre.pgsql>
	<5e124b1d-bd8f-0659-1088-4952464223bc@2ndquadrant.com>
	<20191105141132.GK6962@tamriel.snowman.net>
	<7897.1572964109@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20191105143812.GM6962@tamriel.snowman.net>

Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> In this case, not in the least: we would simply be imposing the sort
>> of *orderly* feature introduction that I thought was the plan from
>> the very beginning [1].  That is, first make "-f -" available, and
>> make it required only in some later version.  If we'd back-patched
>> the optional feature back in April, it might've been okay to require
>> it in v12, but we failed to provide any transition period.

> ... just like we didn't provide any transistion period for the
> recovery.conf changes.

Sure, because there wasn't any practical way to provide a transition
period.  I think that case is entirely not comparable to this one,
either as to whether a transition period is possible, or as to whether
the benefits of the change merit forced breakage.

			regards, tom lane





view thread (38+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <8586.1572965160@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../8586.1572965160@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/8586.1572965160@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, sfrost@snowman.net, peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, imai.yoshikazu@fujitsu.com, euler@timbira.com.br, andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk, pryzby@telsasoft.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: v12 and pg_restore -f-
  In-Reply-To: <8586.1572965160@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox