pg.ddx.io  pgsql-general@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: shammat@gmx.net
To: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Transaction Isolation level for ERP software
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 10:36:20 +0200
Message-ID: <970e7d80-67a3-4c1b-9a02-e1e72e3a2cdb@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52293c938269ffa74a909c4599e12622fbe84628.camel@cybertec.at>
References: <CADWR+qdOYKvq6WCUsB8bs+V_5DL-qX8B_b=EbHiatvOimCfaYg@mail.gmail.com>
	<52293c938269ffa74a909c4599e12622fbe84628.camel@cybertec.at>

Laurenz Albe schrieb am 15.07.2026 um 23:20:
>>    4. Most business apps use REPEATABLE READ as an industry standard.
> 
> I am surprised by that statement.
> 
> My experience is that most developers of "business apps" aren't even aware that there
> are different transaction isolation levels.

I think, this viewpoint might be based on the fact that it's the default isolation level in MySQL/MariaDB 
and due to their "marked share", it might be considered a an "industry standard" by a lot of people. 






view thread (10+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <970e7d80-67a3-4c1b-9a02-e1e72e3a2cdb@gmx.net>
Permalink:  ../970e7d80-67a3-4c1b-9a02-e1e72e3a2cdb@gmx.net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/970e7d80-67a3-4c1b-9a02-e1e72e3a2cdb@gmx.net

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
  Cc: shammat@gmx.net, pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Transaction Isolation level for ERP software
  In-Reply-To: <970e7d80-67a3-4c1b-9a02-e1e72e3a2cdb@gmx.net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox