public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Re: Yet more ROLE changes in v18 beta1???
3+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]

* Re: Yet more ROLE changes in v18 beta1???
@ 2025-06-05 02:57 Tom Lane <[email protected]>
  2025-07-31 12:34 ` Re: Yet more ROLE changes in v18 beta1??? Dominique Devienne <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2025-06-05 02:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dominique Devienne <[email protected]>; +Cc: Robert Haas <[email protected]>; pgsql-general

Dominique Devienne <[email protected]> writes:
> Unfortunately, digging into this is not something I can do right away.
> v18 is still a few months out, I do hope I can investigate before that.

It'd be good if you could prioritize that a bit more.  If there is
a bug rather than an intentional change here, we'd much rather
find it and fix it before 18.0 comes out.

			regards, tom lane






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Yet more ROLE changes in v18 beta1???
  2025-06-05 02:57 Re: Yet more ROLE changes in v18 beta1??? Tom Lane <[email protected]>
@ 2025-07-31 12:34 ` Dominique Devienne <[email protected]>
  2025-09-26 14:19   ` Re: Yet more ROLE changes in v18 beta1??? Dominique Devienne <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread

From: Dominique Devienne @ 2025-07-31 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>; +Cc: Robert Haas <[email protected]>; pgsql-general

On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 4:57 AM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dominique Devienne <[email protected]> writes:
> > Unfortunately, digging into this is not something I can do right away.
> > v18 is still a few months out, I do hope I can investigate before that.
>
> It'd be good if you could prioritize that a bit more.  If there is
> a bug rather than an intentional change here, we'd much rather
> find it and fix it before 18.0 comes out.

Of course Tom. And as a quick update, we've installed beta2 now, but
still get the same v18-specific failure, compared to v17 and v16 (see
below). I'll be looking at this soon. And will report back. --DD

```
D:\>set POSTGRESQL_UTCONFIG=C:\Users\ddevienne\ut_pg_config-18.json
D:\>tests_schemas -t ...  --pq-version
Connected to postgresql://ddevienne@.../ddevienne (17.4, server 18.0)
Running 1 test case...
unknown location(0): fatal error: in "...": class pq::Error: #42501
permission denied to drop role
DETAIL:  Only roles with the CREATEROLE attribute and the ADMIN option
on role "...:ADMIN" may drop this role.
*** 1 failure is detected in the test module "Master Test Suite"
*** failure detail:
*** tests_schemas in 0.596s (user: 0.062s) 23 MB

D:\>set POSTGRESQL_UTCONFIG=C:\Users\ddevienne\ut_pg_config-17.json
D:\>tests_schemas -t ... --pq-version
Connected to postgresql://ddevienne@.../ddevienne (17.4, server 17.5)
Running 1 test case...
*** No errors detected
*** tests_schemas in 0.706s (user: 0.062s) 25 MB

D:\>set POSTGRESQL_UTCONFIG=C:\Users\ddevienne\ut_pg_config-16.json
D:\>tests_schemas -t ... --pq-version
Connected to postgresql://ddevienne@.../ddevienne (17.4, server 16.9)
Running 1 test case...

*** No errors detected
*** tests_schemas in 0.612s (user: 0.047s) 26 MB
```






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Yet more ROLE changes in v18 beta1???
  2025-06-05 02:57 Re: Yet more ROLE changes in v18 beta1??? Tom Lane <[email protected]>
  2025-07-31 12:34 ` Re: Yet more ROLE changes in v18 beta1??? Dominique Devienne <[email protected]>
@ 2025-09-26 14:19   ` Dominique Devienne <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread

From: Dominique Devienne @ 2025-09-26 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>; +Cc: Robert Haas <[email protected]>; pgsql-general

On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 2:34 PM Dominique Devienne <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 4:57 AM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Dominique Devienne <[email protected]> writes:
> > > Unfortunately, digging into this is not something I can do right away.
> > > v18 is still a few months out, I do hope I can investigate before that.
> >
> > It'd be good if you could prioritize that a bit more.  If there is
> > a bug rather than an intentional change here, we'd much rather
> > find it and fix it before 18.0 comes out.
>
> Of course Tom. And as a quick update, we've installed beta2 now, but
> still get the same v18-specific failure, compared to v17 and v16 (see
> below). I'll be looking at this soon. And will report back. --DD

To close out this thread, I'm happy to report that all is well with
v18 official.
Came a bit as a surprise, given our poor experience with betas and the RC,
but magically all tests pass on the official v18. So a GOOD surprise!

It's not impossible this is due to recent (unrelated) changes on our end...
Good thing I never investigated these v18beta/rc failures, I guess. --DD






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2025-09-26 14:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-06-05 02:57 Re: Yet more ROLE changes in v18 beta1??? Tom Lane <[email protected]>
2025-07-31 12:34 ` Dominique Devienne <[email protected]>
2025-09-26 14:19   ` Dominique Devienne <[email protected]>

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox